MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

RKS Neon125 vs Yamaha Sirius FI

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The RKS Neon125 (2026) and the Yamaha Sirius FI (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The RKS Neon125 is a scooter with 125 cc, 9.3 hp and unlisted weight; the Yamaha Sirius FI is a cub / underbone with 114 cc, 8.6 hp and 98 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 49.5 hp/ton versus 49.6 hp/ton. On this measure the Yamaha Sirius FI is 0% ahead.

0-100 km/h (speedometer): RKS Neon125 not reached (top simulated speed 84 km/h), Yamaha Sirius FI not reached (top simulated speed 89 km/h). In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 17.9 m for the RKS Neon125 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 18.5 m for the Yamaha Sirius FI (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The RKS Neon125 stops 0.6 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 84 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 88 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationRKS Neon125Yamaha Sirius FI
Classscootercub / underbone
Engine125 cc114 cc
Power9.3 hp8.6 hp
Wet weightno data98 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)49.5 hp/ton49.6 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)not reached (top simulated speed 84 km/h)not reached (top simulated speed 89 km/h)
60-0 km/h braking distance17.9 m18.5 m
Top speed (calc.)84 km/h88 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons