MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda XL750 Transalp vs KTM 390 Duke

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda XL750 Transalp (2025) and the KTM 390 Duke (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda XL750 Transalp is a adventure bike with 755 cc, 90.5 hp and 210 kg; the KTM 390 Duke is a naked bike with 399 cc, 44.4 hp and 165 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 317.6 hp/ton versus 184.9 hp/ton. On this measure the Honda XL750 Transalp is 72% ahead.

In the simulation the Honda XL750 Transalp covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.23 s and the KTM 390 Duke in 5.48 s; the Honda XL750 Transalp is quicker by 2.25 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.4 m for the Honda XL750 Transalp (with ABS) and 43.7 m for the KTM 390 Duke (with ABS). The Honda XL750 Transalp stops 2.3 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 196 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 167 km/h (test measurement).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda XL750 TransalpKTM 390 Duke
Classadventure bikenaked bike
Engine755 cc399 cc
Power90.5 hp44.4 hp
Wet weight210 kg165 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)317.6 hp/ton184.9 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.23 s5.48 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.4 m43.7 m
Top speed (calc.)196 km/h167 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons