MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda NT1100 vs Yamaha Tracer 9

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda NT1100 (2026) and the Yamaha Tracer 9 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda NT1100 is a touring bike with 1,084 cc, 100.6 hp and 249 kg; the Yamaha Tracer 9 is a touring bike with 890 cc, 117.3 hp and 219 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 310.4 hp/ton versus 399.1 hp/ton. On this measure the Yamaha Tracer 9 is 29% ahead.

In the simulation the Honda NT1100 covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.15 s and the Yamaha Tracer 9 in 2.95 s; the Yamaha Tracer 9 is quicker by 0.20 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.0 m for the Honda NT1100 (with ABS) and 45.0 m for the Yamaha Tracer 9 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The Honda NT1100 stops 4.1 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 194 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 215 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda NT1100Yamaha Tracer 9
Classtouring biketouring bike
Engine1,084 cc890 cc
Power100.6 hp117.3 hp
Wet weight249 kg219 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)310.4 hp/ton399.1 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.15 s2.95 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.0 m45.0 m
Top speed (calc.)194 km/h215 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons