MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda CRF250 Rally vs Yamaha Exciter 155 VVA TCS

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda CRF250 Rally (2026) and the Yamaha Exciter 155 VVA TCS (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda CRF250 Rally is a enduro bike with 249 cc, 24.1 hp and 153 kg; the Yamaha Exciter 155 VVA TCS is a cub / underbone with 155 cc, 18.2 hp and 124 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 105.9 hp/ton versus 91.7 hp/ton. On this measure the Honda CRF250 Rally is 16% ahead.

In the simulation the Honda CRF250 Rally covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 7.61 s and the Yamaha Exciter 155 VVA TCS in 10.46 s; the Honda CRF250 Rally is quicker by 2.85 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 46.8 m for the Honda CRF250 Rally (with ABS) and 46.8 m for the Yamaha Exciter 155 VVA TCS (with ABS). Calculated top speed: 123 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 115 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda CRF250 RallyYamaha Exciter 155 VVA TCS
Classenduro bikecub / underbone
Engine249 cc155 cc
Power24.1 hp18.2 hp
Wet weight153 kg124 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)105.9 hp/ton91.7 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)7.61 s10.46 s
100-0 km/h braking distance46.8 m46.8 m
Top speed (calc.)123 km/h115 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons