MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

CFMoto 250SR vs Yamaha Exciter 155 VVA TCS

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The CFMoto 250SR (2026) and the Yamaha Exciter 155 VVA TCS (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The CFMoto 250SR is a sport bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight; the Yamaha Exciter 155 VVA TCS is a cub / underbone with 155 cc, 18.2 hp and 124 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 105.1 hp/ton versus 91.7 hp/ton. On this measure the CFMoto 250SR is 15% ahead.

In the simulation the CFMoto 250SR covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 8.38 s and the Yamaha Exciter 155 VVA TCS in 10.46 s; the CFMoto 250SR is quicker by 2.09 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 36.4 m for the CFMoto 250SR (with ABS) and 46.8 m for the Yamaha Exciter 155 VVA TCS (with ABS). The CFMoto 250SR stops 10.4 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 142 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 115 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the CFMoto 250SR and class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the Yamaha Exciter 155 VVA TCS. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationCFMoto 250SRYamaha Exciter 155 VVA TCS
Classsport bikecub / underbone
Engine249 cc155 cc
Power26.2 hp18.2 hp
Wet weightno data124 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)105.1 hp/ton91.7 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)8.38 s10.46 s
100-0 km/h braking distance36.4 m46.8 m
Top speed (calc.)142 km/h115 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons