MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

BMW K 1600 GT vs Honda CBR650R

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The BMW K 1600 GT (2026) and the Honda CBR650R (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The BMW K 1600 GT is a touring bike with 1,649 cc, 158.2 hp and 343 kg; the Honda CBR650R is a sport bike with 649 cc, 93.9 hp and 211 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 378.6 hp/ton versus 328.2 hp/ton. On this measure the BMW K 1600 GT is 15% ahead.

In the simulation the BMW K 1600 GT covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.27 s and the Honda CBR650R in 3.33 s; the BMW K 1600 GT is quicker by 0.06 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.0 m for the BMW K 1600 GT (with ABS) and 36.4 m for the Honda CBR650R (with ABS). The Honda CBR650R stops 4.6 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 226 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 220 km/h (manufacturer claim).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the BMW K 1600 GT and model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the Honda CBR650R. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBMW K 1600 GTHonda CBR650R
Classtouring bikesport bike
Engine1,649 cc649 cc
Power158.2 hp93.9 hp
Wet weight343 kg211 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)378.6 hp/ton328.2 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.27 s3.33 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.0 m36.4 m
Top speed (calc.)226 km/h220 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons