MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs BMW K 1600 GTL

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (2025) and the BMW K 1600 GTL (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a naked bike with 200 cc, 24.1 hp and 158 kg; the BMW K 1600 GTL is a touring bike with 1,649 cc, 158.2 hp and 358 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 103.6 hp/ton versus 365.5 hp/ton. On this measure the BMW K 1600 GTL is 253% ahead.

In the simulation the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 9.07 s and the BMW K 1600 GTL in 3.34 s; the BMW K 1600 GTL is quicker by 5.74 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 43.7 m for the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (with ABS) and 41.0 m for the BMW K 1600 GTL (with ABS). The BMW K 1600 GTL stops 2.7 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 111 km/h (GPS measurement) versus 226 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 and class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the BMW K 1600 GTL. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBajaj Pulsar NS200BMW K 1600 GTL
Classnaked biketouring bike
Engine200 cc1,649 cc
Power24.1 hp158.2 hp
Wet weight158 kg358 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)103.6 hp/ton365.5 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)9.07 s3.34 s
100-0 km/h braking distance43.7 m41.0 m
Top speed (calc.)111 km/h226 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons