MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Harley-Davidson Sportster S

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (2025) and the Harley-Davidson Sportster S (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a naked bike with 200 cc, 24.1 hp and 158 kg; the Harley-Davidson Sportster S is a cruiser with 1,252 cc, 120.7 hp and 228 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 103.6 hp/ton versus 398.3 hp/ton. On this measure the Harley-Davidson Sportster S is 284% ahead.

In the simulation the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 9.07 s and the Harley-Davidson Sportster S in 2.97 s; the Harley-Davidson Sportster S is quicker by 6.11 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 43.7 m for the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (with ABS) and 44.7 m for the Harley-Davidson Sportster S (with ABS). The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 stops 1.0 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 111 km/h (GPS measurement) versus 194 km/h (manufacturer claim).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBajaj Pulsar NS200Harley-Davidson Sportster S
Classnaked bikecruiser
Engine200 cc1,252 cc
Power24.1 hp120.7 hp
Wet weight158 kg228 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)103.6 hp/ton398.3 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)9.07 s2.97 s
100-0 km/h braking distance43.7 m44.7 m
Top speed (calc.)111 km/h194 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons