MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Arora Safari Pro 125 vs CFMoto 250NK

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Arora Safari Pro 125 (2026) and the CFMoto 250NK (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Arora Safari Pro 125 is a scooter with 125 cc, 9.3 hp and unlisted weight; the CFMoto 250NK is a naked bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 45.5 hp/ton versus 111.2 hp/ton. On this measure the CFMoto 250NK is 144% ahead.

0-100 km/h (speedometer): Arora Safari Pro 125 not reached (top simulated speed 84 km/h), CFMoto 250NK 8.91 s. In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 17.9 m for the Arora Safari Pro 125 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 17.3 m for the CFMoto 250NK (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The CFMoto 250NK stops 0.6 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 83 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 115 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the Arora Safari Pro 125 and model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the CFMoto 250NK. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationArora Safari Pro 125CFMoto 250NK
Classscooternaked bike
Engine125 cc249 cc
Power9.3 hp26.2 hp
Wet weightno datano data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)45.5 hp/ton111.2 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)not reached (top simulated speed 84 km/h)8.91 s
60-0 km/h braking distance17.9 m17.3 m
Top speed (calc.)83 km/h115 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons