MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

CFMoto 250NK vs Yamaha PG-1

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The CFMoto 250NK (2026) and the Yamaha PG-1 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The CFMoto 250NK is a naked bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight; the Yamaha PG-1 is a cub / underbone with 114 cc, unlisted power and 109 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 111.2 hp/ton versus no data.

In the simulation the CFMoto 250NK covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 8.91 s and the Yamaha PG-1 in 29.82 s; the CFMoto 250NK is quicker by 20.92 s. In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 17.3 m for the CFMoto 250NK (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 16.9 m for the Yamaha PG-1 (with ABS). The Yamaha PG-1 stops 0.4 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 115 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 93 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the CFMoto 250NK and class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the Yamaha PG-1. Missing manufacturer data (power, torque) is estimated by class regression, not measured. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationCFMoto 250NKYamaha PG-1
Classnaked bikecub / underbone
Engine249 cc114 cc
Power26.2 hpno data
Wet weightno data109 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)111.2 hp/tonno data
0-100 km/h (speedometer)8.91 s29.82 s
60-0 km/h braking distance17.3 m16.9 m
Top speed (calc.)115 km/h93 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons