MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

KTM 250 EXC-F vs Yamaha MT-09

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The KTM 250 EXC-F (2025) and the Yamaha MT-09 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The KTM 250 EXC-F is a enduro bike with 250 cc, unlisted power and unlisted weight; the Yamaha MT-09 is a naked bike with 890 cc, 117.3 hp and 193 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: no data versus 437.8 hp/ton.

In the simulation the KTM 250 EXC-F covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 7.92 s and the Yamaha MT-09 in 3.11 s; the Yamaha MT-09 is quicker by 4.81 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 51.5 m for the KTM 250 EXC-F (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 48.0 m for the Yamaha MT-09 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The Yamaha MT-09 stops 3.4 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 123 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 199 km/h (manufacturer claim).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the KTM 250 EXC-F and model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the Yamaha MT-09. Missing manufacturer data (power, torque, weight) is estimated by class regression, not measured. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationKTM 250 EXC-FYamaha MT-09
Classenduro bikenaked bike
Engine250 cc890 cc
Powerno data117.3 hp
Wet weightno data193 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)no data437.8 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)7.92 s3.11 s
100-0 km/h braking distance51.5 m48.0 m
Top speed (calc.)123 km/h199 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons