MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda NX500 vs Yamaha Sirius FI

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda NX500 (2025) and the Yamaha Sirius FI (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda NX500 is a adventure bike with 471 cc, 46.9 hp and 196 kg; the Yamaha Sirius FI is a cub / underbone with 114 cc, 8.6 hp and 98 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 173.2 hp/ton versus 49.6 hp/ton. On this measure the Honda NX500 is 249% ahead.

0-100 km/h (speedometer): Honda NX500 5.11 s, Yamaha Sirius FI not reached (top simulated speed 89 km/h). In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 14.9 m for the Honda NX500 (with ABS) and 18.5 m for the Yamaha Sirius FI (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The Honda NX500 stops 3.6 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 152 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 88 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda NX500Yamaha Sirius FI
Classadventure bikecub / underbone
Engine471 cc114 cc
Power46.9 hp8.6 hp
Wet weight196 kg98 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)173.2 hp/ton49.6 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)5.11 snot reached (top simulated speed 89 km/h)
60-0 km/h braking distance14.9 m18.5 m
Top speed (calc.)152 km/h88 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons