MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda CB125F vs TVS Raider 125

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda CB125F (2025) and the TVS Raider 125 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda CB125F is a naked bike with 124 cc, 10.7 hp and 117 kg; the TVS Raider 125 is a naked bike with 125 cc, 11.4 hp and 120 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 55.9 hp/ton versus 58.5 hp/ton. On this measure the TVS Raider 125 is 5% ahead.

In the simulation the Honda CB125F covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 21.61 s and the TVS Raider 125 in 21.08 s; the TVS Raider 125 is quicker by 0.52 s. In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 17.3 m for the Honda CB125F (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 17.3 m for the TVS Raider 125 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 100 km/h (manufacturer claim) versus 105 km/h (GPS measurement).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda CB125FTVS Raider 125
Classnaked bikenaked bike
Engine124 cc125 cc
Power10.7 hp11.4 hp
Wet weight117 kg120 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)55.9 hp/ton58.5 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)21.61 s21.08 s
60-0 km/h braking distance17.3 m17.3 m
Top speed (calc.)100 km/h105 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons