MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda CB125F vs KTM 390 Duke

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda CB125F (2025) and the KTM 390 Duke (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda CB125F is a naked bike with 124 cc, 10.7 hp and 117 kg; the KTM 390 Duke is a naked bike with 399 cc, 44.4 hp and 165 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 55.9 hp/ton versus 184.9 hp/ton. On this measure the KTM 390 Duke is 231% ahead.

In the simulation the Honda CB125F covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 21.61 s and the KTM 390 Duke in 5.48 s; the KTM 390 Duke is quicker by 16.12 s. In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 17.3 m for the Honda CB125F (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 15.7 m for the KTM 390 Duke (with ABS). The KTM 390 Duke stops 1.6 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 100 km/h (manufacturer claim) versus 167 km/h (test measurement).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda CB125FKTM 390 Duke
Classnaked bikenaked bike
Engine124 cc399 cc
Power10.7 hp44.4 hp
Wet weight117 kg165 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)55.9 hp/ton184.9 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)21.61 s5.48 s
60-0 km/h braking distance17.3 m15.7 m
Top speed (calc.)100 km/h167 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons