MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda CB125F vs Honda NT1100

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda CB125F (2025) and the Honda NT1100 (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda CB125F is a naked bike with 124 cc, 10.7 hp and 117 kg; the Honda NT1100 is a touring bike with 1,084 cc, 100.6 hp and 249 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 55.9 hp/ton versus 310.4 hp/ton. On this measure the Honda NT1100 is 455% ahead.

In the simulation the Honda CB125F covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 21.61 s and the Honda NT1100 in 3.15 s; the Honda NT1100 is quicker by 18.46 s. In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 17.3 m for the Honda CB125F (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 14.8 m for the Honda NT1100 (with ABS). The Honda NT1100 stops 2.5 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 100 km/h (manufacturer claim) versus 194 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda CB125FHonda NT1100
Classnaked biketouring bike
Engine124 cc1,084 cc
Power10.7 hp100.6 hp
Wet weight117 kg249 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)55.9 hp/ton310.4 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)21.61 s3.15 s
60-0 km/h braking distance17.3 m14.8 m
Top speed (calc.)100 km/h194 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons