MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

CFMoto 250NK vs Suzuki V-Strom 800 DE

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The CFMoto 250NK (2026) and the Suzuki V-Strom 800 DE (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The CFMoto 250NK is a naked bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight; the Suzuki V-Strom 800 DE is a adventure bike with 776 cc, 83.1 hp and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 111.2 hp/ton versus 282.1 hp/ton. On this measure the Suzuki V-Strom 800 DE is 154% ahead.

In the simulation the CFMoto 250NK covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 8.91 s and the Suzuki V-Strom 800 DE in 3.49 s; the Suzuki V-Strom 800 DE is quicker by 5.41 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 48.0 m for the CFMoto 250NK (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 41.4 m for the Suzuki V-Strom 800 DE (with ABS). The Suzuki V-Strom 800 DE stops 6.6 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 115 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 190 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Missing manufacturer data (weight) is estimated by class regression, not measured. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationCFMoto 250NKSuzuki V-Strom 800 DE
Classnaked bikeadventure bike
Engine249 cc776 cc
Power26.2 hp83.1 hp
Wet weightno datano data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)111.2 hp/ton282.1 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)8.91 s3.49 s
100-0 km/h braking distance48.0 m41.4 m
Top speed (calc.)115 km/h190 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons