MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

BMW S 1000 RR vs Husqvarna FE 350

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The BMW S 1000 RR (2025) and the Husqvarna FE 350 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The BMW S 1000 RR is a sport bike with 999 cc, 206.5 hp and 198 kg; the Husqvarna FE 350 is a enduro bike with 350 cc, unlisted power and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 756.5 hp/ton versus no data.

In the simulation the BMW S 1000 RR covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 2.84 s and the Husqvarna FE 350 in 5.62 s; the BMW S 1000 RR is quicker by 2.78 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 36.4 m for the BMW S 1000 RR (with ABS) and 51.5 m for the Husqvarna FE 350 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The BMW S 1000 RR stops 15.0 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 287 km/h (manufacturer claim) versus 138 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the BMW S 1000 RR and class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the Husqvarna FE 350. Missing manufacturer data (power, torque, weight) is estimated by class regression, not measured. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBMW S 1000 RRHusqvarna FE 350
Classsport bikeenduro bike
Engine999 cc350 cc
Power206.5 hpno data
Wet weight198 kgno data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)756.5 hp/tonno data
0-100 km/h (speedometer)2.84 s5.62 s
100-0 km/h braking distance36.4 m51.5 m
Top speed (calc.)287 km/h138 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons