MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

BMW R 1300 RT vs Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The BMW R 1300 RT (2026) and the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The BMW R 1300 RT is a touring bike with 1,300 cc, 143.5 hp and 281 kg; the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R is a sport bike with 998 cc, 193.1 hp and 209 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 403.1 hp/ton versus 680.0 hp/ton. On this measure the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R is 69% ahead.

In the simulation the BMW R 1300 RT covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.37 s and the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R in 3.16 s; the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R is quicker by 0.22 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.0 m for the BMW R 1300 RT (with ABS) and 36.4 m for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R (with ABS). The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R stops 4.6 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 229 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 286 km/h (manufacturer claim).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBMW R 1300 RTKawasaki Ninja ZX-10R
Classtouring bikesport bike
Engine1,300 cc998 cc
Power143.5 hp193.1 hp
Wet weight281 kg209 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)403.1 hp/ton680.0 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.37 s3.16 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.0 m36.4 m
Top speed (calc.)229 km/h286 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons