MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

BMW K 1600 GT vs Yamaha MT-25

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The BMW K 1600 GT (2026) and the Yamaha MT-25 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The BMW K 1600 GT is a touring bike with 1,649 cc, 158.2 hp and 343 kg; the Yamaha MT-25 is a naked bike with 250 cc, 35.4 hp and 166 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 378.6 hp/ton versus 146.9 hp/ton. On this measure the BMW K 1600 GT is 158% ahead.

In the simulation the BMW K 1600 GT covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.27 s and the Yamaha MT-25 in 6.35 s; the BMW K 1600 GT is quicker by 3.09 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.0 m for the BMW K 1600 GT (with ABS) and 48.0 m for the Yamaha MT-25 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The BMW K 1600 GT stops 7.1 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 226 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 147 km/h (derived (GPS ratio)).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the BMW K 1600 GT and model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the Yamaha MT-25. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBMW K 1600 GTYamaha MT-25
Classtouring bikenaked bike
Engine1,649 cc250 cc
Power158.2 hp35.4 hp
Wet weight343 kg166 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)378.6 hp/ton146.9 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.27 s6.35 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.0 m48.0 m
Top speed (calc.)226 km/h147 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons