MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Suzuki V-Strom 1050 DE

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (2025) and the Suzuki V-Strom 1050 DE (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a naked bike with 200 cc, 24.1 hp and 158 kg; the Suzuki V-Strom 1050 DE is a adventure bike with 1,037 cc, 105.9 hp and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 103.6 hp/ton versus 341.1 hp/ton. On this measure the Suzuki V-Strom 1050 DE is 229% ahead.

In the simulation the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 9.07 s and the Suzuki V-Strom 1050 DE in 3.12 s; the Suzuki V-Strom 1050 DE is quicker by 5.96 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 43.7 m for the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (with ABS) and 41.4 m for the Suzuki V-Strom 1050 DE (with ABS). The Suzuki V-Strom 1050 DE stops 2.3 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 111 km/h (GPS measurement) versus 194 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Missing manufacturer data (weight) is estimated by class regression, not measured. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBajaj Pulsar NS200Suzuki V-Strom 1050 DE
Classnaked bikeadventure bike
Engine200 cc1,037 cc
Power24.1 hp105.9 hp
Wet weight158 kgno data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)103.6 hp/ton341.1 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)9.07 s3.12 s
100-0 km/h braking distance43.7 m41.4 m
Top speed (calc.)111 km/h194 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons