MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Yamaha MT-09 vs Yamaha Tracer 9

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Yamaha MT-09 (2025) and the Yamaha Tracer 9 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Yamaha MT-09 is a naked bike with 890 cc, 117.3 hp and 193 kg; the Yamaha Tracer 9 is a touring bike with 890 cc, 117.3 hp and 219 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 437.8 hp/ton versus 399.1 hp/ton. On this measure the Yamaha MT-09 is 10% ahead.

In the simulation the Yamaha MT-09 covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.11 s and the Yamaha Tracer 9 in 2.95 s; the Yamaha Tracer 9 is quicker by 0.16 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 48.0 m for the Yamaha MT-09 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 45.0 m for the Yamaha Tracer 9 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The Yamaha Tracer 9 stops 3.0 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 199 km/h (manufacturer claim) versus 215 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationYamaha MT-09Yamaha Tracer 9
Classnaked biketouring bike
Engine890 cc890 cc
Power117.3 hp117.3 hp
Wet weight193 kg219 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)437.8 hp/ton399.1 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.11 s2.95 s
100-0 km/h braking distance48.0 m45.0 m
Top speed (calc.)199 km/h215 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons