MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

KTM 390 Duke vs TVS Raider 125

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The KTM 390 Duke (2025) and the TVS Raider 125 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The KTM 390 Duke is a naked bike with 399 cc, 44.4 hp and 165 kg; the TVS Raider 125 is a naked bike with 125 cc, 11.4 hp and 120 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 184.9 hp/ton versus 58.5 hp/ton. On this measure the KTM 390 Duke is 216% ahead.

In the simulation the KTM 390 Duke covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 5.48 s and the TVS Raider 125 in 21.08 s; the KTM 390 Duke is quicker by 15.60 s. In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 15.7 m for the KTM 390 Duke (with ABS) and 17.3 m for the TVS Raider 125 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The KTM 390 Duke stops 1.6 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 167 km/h (test measurement) versus 105 km/h (GPS measurement).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationKTM 390 DukeTVS Raider 125
Classnaked bikenaked bike
Engine399 cc125 cc
Power44.4 hp11.4 hp
Wet weight165 kg120 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)184.9 hp/ton58.5 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)5.48 s21.08 s
60-0 km/h braking distance15.7 m17.3 m
Top speed (calc.)167 km/h105 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons