MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Kawasaki KLE500 vs RKS Neon125

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Kawasaki KLE500 (2026) and the RKS Neon125 (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Kawasaki KLE500 is a adventure bike with 451 cc, 44.8 hp and unlisted weight; the RKS Neon125 is a scooter with 125 cc, 9.3 hp and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 162.9 hp/ton versus 49.5 hp/ton. On this measure the Kawasaki KLE500 is 229% ahead.

0-100 km/h (speedometer): Kawasaki KLE500 4.95 s, RKS Neon125 not reached (top simulated speed 84 km/h). In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 14.9 m for the Kawasaki KLE500 (with ABS) and 17.9 m for the RKS Neon125 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The Kawasaki KLE500 stops 3.0 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 150 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 84 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for both. Missing manufacturer data (weight) is estimated by class regression, not measured. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationKawasaki KLE500RKS Neon125
Classadventure bikescooter
Engine451 cc125 cc
Power44.8 hp9.3 hp
Wet weightno datano data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)162.9 hp/ton49.5 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)4.95 snot reached (top simulated speed 84 km/h)
60-0 km/h braking distance14.9 m17.9 m
Top speed (calc.)150 km/h84 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons