MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda PCX125 vs TVS Raider 125

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda PCX125 (2025) and the TVS Raider 125 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda PCX125 is a scooter with 125 cc, 12.3 hp and 134 kg; the TVS Raider 125 is a naked bike with 125 cc, 11.4 hp and 120 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 59.0 hp/ton versus 58.5 hp/ton. On this measure the Honda PCX125 is 1% ahead.

In the simulation the Honda PCX125 covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 20.41 s and the TVS Raider 125 in 21.08 s; the Honda PCX125 is quicker by 0.67 s. In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 16.3 m for the Honda PCX125 (with ABS) and 17.3 m for the TVS Raider 125 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The Honda PCX125 stops 1.0 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 92 km/h (GPS measurement) versus 105 km/h (GPS measurement).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda PCX125TVS Raider 125
Classscooternaked bike
Engine125 cc125 cc
Power12.3 hp11.4 hp
Wet weight134 kg120 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)59.0 hp/ton58.5 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)20.41 s21.08 s
60-0 km/h braking distance16.3 m17.3 m
Top speed (calc.)92 km/h105 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons