MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda NX500 vs Yamaha PG-1

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda NX500 (2025) and the Yamaha PG-1 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda NX500 is a adventure bike with 471 cc, 46.9 hp and 196 kg; the Yamaha PG-1 is a cub / underbone with 114 cc, unlisted power and 109 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 173.2 hp/ton versus no data.

In the simulation the Honda NX500 covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 5.11 s and the Yamaha PG-1 in 29.82 s; the Honda NX500 is quicker by 24.71 s. In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 14.9 m for the Honda NX500 (with ABS) and 16.9 m for the Yamaha PG-1 (with ABS). The Honda NX500 stops 2.0 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 152 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 93 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for both. Missing manufacturer data (power, torque) is estimated by class regression, not measured. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda NX500Yamaha PG-1
Classadventure bikecub / underbone
Engine471 cc114 cc
Power46.9 hpno data
Wet weight196 kg109 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)173.2 hp/tonno data
0-100 km/h (speedometer)5.11 s29.82 s
60-0 km/h braking distance14.9 m16.9 m
Top speed (calc.)152 km/h93 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons