MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Honda CB125F vs RKS RZ125

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Honda CB125F (2025) and the RKS RZ125 (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Honda CB125F is a naked bike with 124 cc, 10.7 hp and 117 kg; the RKS RZ125 is a sport bike with 125 cc, 14.5 hp and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 55.9 hp/ton versus 63.8 hp/ton. On this measure the RKS RZ125 is 14% ahead.

In the simulation the Honda CB125F covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 21.61 s and the RKS RZ125 in 13.42 s; the RKS RZ125 is quicker by 8.19 s. In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 17.3 m for the Honda CB125F (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 13.1 m for the RKS RZ125 (with ABS). The RKS RZ125 stops 4.2 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 100 km/h (manufacturer claim) versus 125 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the Honda CB125F and class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the RKS RZ125. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationHonda CB125FRKS RZ125
Classnaked bikesport bike
Engine124 cc125 cc
Power10.7 hp14.5 hp
Wet weight117 kgno data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)55.9 hp/ton63.8 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)21.61 s13.42 s
60-0 km/h braking distance17.3 m13.1 m
Top speed (calc.)100 km/h125 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons