MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

CFMoto 250SR vs Honda XL750 Transalp

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The CFMoto 250SR (2026) and the Honda XL750 Transalp (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The CFMoto 250SR is a sport bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight; the Honda XL750 Transalp is a adventure bike with 755 cc, 90.5 hp and 210 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 105.1 hp/ton versus 317.6 hp/ton. On this measure the Honda XL750 Transalp is 202% ahead.

In the simulation the CFMoto 250SR covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 8.38 s and the Honda XL750 Transalp in 3.23 s; the Honda XL750 Transalp is quicker by 5.15 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 36.4 m for the CFMoto 250SR (with ABS) and 41.4 m for the Honda XL750 Transalp (with ABS). The CFMoto 250SR stops 5.0 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 142 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 196 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationCFMoto 250SRHonda XL750 Transalp
Classsport bikeadventure bike
Engine249 cc755 cc
Power26.2 hp90.5 hp
Wet weightno data210 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)105.1 hp/ton317.6 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)8.38 s3.23 s
100-0 km/h braking distance36.4 m41.4 m
Top speed (calc.)142 km/h196 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons