MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

CFMoto 250NK vs RKS RZ125

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The CFMoto 250NK (2026) and the RKS RZ125 (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The CFMoto 250NK is a naked bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight; the RKS RZ125 is a sport bike with 125 cc, 14.5 hp and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 111.2 hp/ton versus 63.8 hp/ton. On this measure the CFMoto 250NK is 74% ahead.

In the simulation the CFMoto 250NK covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 8.91 s and the RKS RZ125 in 13.42 s; the CFMoto 250NK is quicker by 4.51 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 48.0 m for the CFMoto 250NK (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 36.4 m for the RKS RZ125 (with ABS). The RKS RZ125 stops 11.6 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 115 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 125 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the CFMoto 250NK and class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the RKS RZ125. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationCFMoto 250NKRKS RZ125
Classnaked bikesport bike
Engine249 cc125 cc
Power26.2 hp14.5 hp
Wet weightno datano data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)111.2 hp/ton63.8 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)8.91 s13.42 s
100-0 km/h braking distance48.0 m36.4 m
Top speed (calc.)115 km/h125 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons