MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

CFMoto 250NK vs Honda NX500

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The CFMoto 250NK (2026) and the Honda NX500 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The CFMoto 250NK is a naked bike with 249 cc, 26.2 hp and unlisted weight; the Honda NX500 is a adventure bike with 471 cc, 46.9 hp and 196 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 111.2 hp/ton versus 173.2 hp/ton. On this measure the Honda NX500 is 56% ahead.

In the simulation the CFMoto 250NK covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 8.91 s and the Honda NX500 in 5.11 s; the Honda NX500 is quicker by 3.80 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 48.0 m for the CFMoto 250NK (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS) and 41.4 m for the Honda NX500 (with ABS). The Honda NX500 stops 6.6 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 115 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 152 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the CFMoto 250NK and class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the Honda NX500. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationCFMoto 250NKHonda NX500
Classnaked bikeadventure bike
Engine249 cc471 cc
Power26.2 hp46.9 hp
Wet weightno data196 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)111.2 hp/ton173.2 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)8.91 s5.11 s
100-0 km/h braking distance48.0 m41.4 m
Top speed (calc.)115 km/h152 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons