MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

BMW R 1300 RT vs Kawasaki Vulcan S

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The BMW R 1300 RT (2026) and the Kawasaki Vulcan S (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The BMW R 1300 RT is a touring bike with 1,300 cc, 143.5 hp and 281 kg; the Kawasaki Vulcan S is a cruiser with 649 cc, 59.9 hp and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 403.1 hp/ton versus 226.5 hp/ton. On this measure the BMW R 1300 RT is 78% ahead.

In the simulation the BMW R 1300 RT covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.37 s and the Kawasaki Vulcan S in 4.49 s; the BMW R 1300 RT is quicker by 1.11 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.0 m for the BMW R 1300 RT (with ABS) and 44.7 m for the Kawasaki Vulcan S (with ABS). The BMW R 1300 RT stops 3.7 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 229 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 173 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Missing manufacturer data (weight) is estimated by class regression, not measured. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBMW R 1300 RTKawasaki Vulcan S
Classtouring bikecruiser
Engine1,300 cc649 cc
Power143.5 hp59.9 hp
Wet weight281 kgno data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)403.1 hp/ton226.5 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.37 s4.49 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.0 m44.7 m
Top speed (calc.)229 km/h173 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons