MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

BMW K 1600 GTL vs Yamaha MT-07

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The BMW K 1600 GTL (2026) and the Yamaha MT-07 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The BMW K 1600 GTL is a touring bike with 1,649 cc, 158.2 hp and 358 kg; the Yamaha MT-07 is a naked bike with 689 cc, 72.4 hp and 183 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 365.5 hp/ton versus 280.7 hp/ton. On this measure the BMW K 1600 GTL is 30% ahead.

In the simulation the BMW K 1600 GTL covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.34 s and the Yamaha MT-07 in 3.48 s; the BMW K 1600 GTL is quicker by 0.14 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.0 m for the BMW K 1600 GTL (with ABS) and 48.0 m for the Yamaha MT-07 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The BMW K 1600 GTL stops 7.1 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 226 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 195 km/h (GPS measurement).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for the BMW K 1600 GTL and model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for the Yamaha MT-07. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBMW K 1600 GTLYamaha MT-07
Classtouring bikenaked bike
Engine1,649 cc689 cc
Power158.2 hp72.4 hp
Wet weight358 kg183 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)365.5 hp/ton280.7 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.34 s3.48 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.0 m48.0 m
Top speed (calc.)226 km/h195 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons