MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

BMW K 1600 GTL vs RKS Neon125

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The BMW K 1600 GTL (2026) and the RKS Neon125 (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The BMW K 1600 GTL is a touring bike with 1,649 cc, 158.2 hp and 358 kg; the RKS Neon125 is a scooter with 125 cc, 9.3 hp and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 365.5 hp/ton versus 49.5 hp/ton. On this measure the BMW K 1600 GTL is 639% ahead.

0-100 km/h (speedometer): BMW K 1600 GTL 3.34 s, RKS Neon125 not reached (top simulated speed 84 km/h). In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 14.8 m for the BMW K 1600 GTL (with ABS) and 17.9 m for the RKS Neon125 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The BMW K 1600 GTL stops 3.1 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 226 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 84 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBMW K 1600 GTLRKS Neon125
Classtouring bikescooter
Engine1,649 cc125 cc
Power158.2 hp9.3 hp
Wet weight358 kgno data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)365.5 hp/ton49.5 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.34 snot reached (top simulated speed 84 km/h)
60-0 km/h braking distance14.8 m17.9 m
Top speed (calc.)226 km/h84 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons