MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

BMW K 1600 GT vs Husqvarna FE 350

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The BMW K 1600 GT (2026) and the Husqvarna FE 350 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The BMW K 1600 GT is a touring bike with 1,649 cc, 158.2 hp and 343 kg; the Husqvarna FE 350 is a enduro bike with 350 cc, unlisted power and unlisted weight. Power-to-weight with the rider: 378.6 hp/ton versus no data.

In the simulation the BMW K 1600 GT covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 3.27 s and the Husqvarna FE 350 in 5.62 s; the BMW K 1600 GT is quicker by 2.35 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 41.0 m for the BMW K 1600 GT (with ABS) and 51.5 m for the Husqvarna FE 350 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The BMW K 1600 GT stops 10.5 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 226 km/h (estimated from power and drag) versus 138 km/h (estimated from power and drag).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses class-average calibration (no accepted model-specific road test) for both. Missing manufacturer data (power, torque, weight) is estimated by class regression, not measured. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBMW K 1600 GTHusqvarna FE 350
Classtouring bikeenduro bike
Engine1,649 cc350 cc
Power158.2 hpno data
Wet weight343 kgno data
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)378.6 hp/tonno data
0-100 km/h (speedometer)3.27 s5.62 s
100-0 km/h braking distance41.0 m51.5 m
Top speed (calc.)226 km/h138 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons