MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (2025) and the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R (2026) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a naked bike with 200 cc, 24.1 hp and 158 kg; the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R is a sport bike with 998 cc, 193.1 hp and 209 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 103.6 hp/ton versus 680.0 hp/ton. On this measure the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R is 556% ahead.

In the simulation the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 covers 0-100 km/h (speedometer) in 9.07 s and the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R in 3.16 s; the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R is quicker by 5.92 s. In the 100-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 43.7 m for the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (with ABS) and 36.4 m for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R (with ABS). The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R stops 7.3 m shorter. Calculated top speed: 111 km/h (GPS measurement) versus 286 km/h (manufacturer claim).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBajaj Pulsar NS200Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R
Classnaked bikesport bike
Engine200 cc998 cc
Power24.1 hp193.1 hp
Wet weight158 kg209 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)103.6 hp/ton680.0 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)9.07 s3.16 s
100-0 km/h braking distance43.7 m36.4 m
Top speed (calc.)111 km/h286 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons