MOTOKIYAS.

Motorcycles › Compare

Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Honda Dio 110

ESTIMATED SIMULATION

Run the comparison →

The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (2025) and the Honda Dio 110 (2025) are compared with the same Moto Kıyas physics model under identical conditions: flat dry asphalt, no wind, a 75 kg rider and no passenger. The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a naked bike with 200 cc, 24.1 hp and 158 kg; the Honda Dio 110 is a scooter with 109 cc, 8.6 hp and 96 kg. Power-to-weight with the rider: 103.6 hp/ton versus 50.2 hp/ton. On this measure the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is 106% ahead.

0-100 km/h (speedometer): Bajaj Pulsar NS200 9.07 s, Honda Dio 110 not reached (top simulated speed 68 km/h). In the 60-0 km/h brake test, braking distance without the 0.3 s reaction time is 15.7 m for the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 (with ABS) and 17.9 m for the Honda Dio 110 (ABS unknown, class assumption: no ABS). The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 stops 2.2 m shorter. The standard 60-0 test is used because one calculated top speed is below 110 km/h. Calculated top speed: 111 km/h (GPS measurement) versus 84 km/h (manufacturer claim).

All values are an estimated simulation, not road-test measurements. Technical data comes from the sources listed below; the model uses model-specific parameters calibrated against published road tests for both. Open the interactive app (currently in Turkish) to watch the run side by side and change the load.

Estimated simulationBajaj Pulsar NS200Honda Dio 110
Classnaked bikescooter
Engine200 cc109 cc
Power24.1 hp8.6 hp
Wet weight158 kg96 kg
Power-to-weight (75 kg rider)103.6 hp/ton50.2 hp/ton
0-100 km/h (speedometer)9.07 snot reached (top simulated speed 68 km/h)
60-0 km/h braking distance15.7 m17.9 m
Top speed (calc.)111 km/h84 km/h

Data sources and calibration

Specifications: the sources below (manufacturer pages, plus road-test or spec sites where the manufacturer gives no figure). Acceleration, braking and top speed: Moto Kıyas physics simulation (power/torque curve, gearing, drag, traction and wheelie limits, ABS assumption), calibrated against published road tests where available. Estimated, not measured.

More comparisons